Suddenly it seems I went from just being a blogger who could write his own personal opinions into being an Editor who reads and publishes mainly other peoples work.  OK fair enough, I brought it upon myself but I sometimes miss the early days on the old site.

But what I did not realise was the amount of work involved in being an half competent editor and piggy in the middle to patriots who see a different way forward or patriots who see a different enemy to their kinsmen and this is what I am going to write about now.

The worst part of being The Editor is the moderation of comments.  They suck up my time like nothing else and so I have taken steps to try auto validate most of them depending on certain conditions but still I am forced to moderate large numbers of them.

The penalty for not doing so is to see the red shite(a pox on them) agents post comments of a violent or illegal nature that can then be used against the site or our noble cause.  This happens on a daily basis and there is little I can do about it but have lots of "key word" triggers that send a comment to the moderation queue.

I could make life easier for myself if I were to disable "anonymous" comments but were I to do this, it would deny the ability of many genuine readers to post without fear of being identified in places of work where it is considered a crime to be a patriot.

Also information is send in by people who want to let us know something but would prefer not to be named for fear of "reprisals".  I must respect their wish to remain anonymous.  But anon comments take up a huge amount of time that could be better spent.

But the moderation queue brings with it all sorts of aggravation.  I do occasionally sleep or there is a log jam in Intense Debate that causes huge numbers of comments to be held until they burst through and come flooding into my mail box.

Of course, not all people who post comments are aware of this and some, impatient, fire of emails demanding to know why I am censoring their comments or repost their original comment thinking that might get published and add a line saying something along the lines of "I know you will not post this - so much for freedom of speech".

And then wham.  One of our excellent writers will publish an article on a subject that invokes strong feelings and the "Comments War" starts and gets invariably nasty.  This is the worst of times for an editor who believes in Freedom of Speech and also has the gift of always being able to see two sides of an argument regardless of personal view.

And one such battle going on at the moment, is again the subject of the Jews and Zionism and this is a subject that to be honest, I am heartily sick and tired of listening to and reading about.  Our Country is burning, out future as a people hangs by a thread and we bicker about the definition of Zionism?

Now this is my opinion and mine alone.  I fully support the right for Israel to exist as a nation and to take ANY actions they deem necessary to safeguard the lives of their citizens, even pre-emptive action against those who would destroy them.

I even understand, why through politicians in Our Country who have become "Friends of Israel" their right to do so.  I would hope that a British National Party government would build links with other Nationalist countries to have a similar "Friends of the UK" within their governments.

However, what I will always question, is whether a "Civic British" Politician with blood ties to another country be it Israel or Pakistan can ever truly have the best interests of their host country at heart.  That does not make me anti-Semitic or anti-Pakistan.  It is just common sense.

Now I know that those who hate the Jews try to cover up their anti-Semitism by saying things like "We are not anti-Jewish, we are anti-Zionist" and perhaps some of them are but most are not.  They are just plain anti-semitic period.

Then you have the communists posing as "pure nationalists" who seek to cause division in the Nationalist movement and actually being the main instigators of anti-Jewish attacks.  How long would Gerry "Unstable" Gable last if he could not point at the comments these people make on so called Nationalist Forums to support his reason for Searchlights existence?

Now, I know about the Rothchilds and the Oppenheimers and I know they are Jews (and the definition of what is a Jew is an whole new can of worms) but I do not want to see them hang for being Jews, I want to see them hang for exploiting the people of not just Our Country but the world.  They have about as much loyalty to Israel as I have to Islamabad - none.

The International Bankers are not just Jews, they come from all races of people.  If you really want to dig into who runs Our Country then dig into our ancient families with their huge estates.  They have been ruling us from behind the scenes for generations.  One day the British National Party is going to have to take a very SERIOUS look at these people and also land reform, because that truly is an injustice to the British People.

But the Jews do nothing to help themselves when they publish rubbish like the following that was left on one of their forums concerning Reconquista's excellent article (I am not in full agreement but my opinion should count for nothing as editor).

Great Article.  However, as a warning, the BNP is a very devisive topic on this forum; obviously based upon their evil Neo-Nazi pro-Muslim past.  While I welcome their sudden move to righteousness and zionism, and have close ties with many new members, many members here will never accept them and ; and I understand their rationale.... so I am not posting their material out of courtesy here.

What bollox and bollox that destroys the myth that Jews are bright, sharp people. They should understand that the majority of us who support the BNP do not give a shit about them or even give a shit about the holocaust - our war is now.  My only views on the 2nd World War are that my father was shot by the Germans, my uncle suffered torture as a prisoner of war of the Japanese and my father-in-law was wounded as a "waist gunner" in a B52 bomber and that we should have nuked Moscow and maybe Peking in 1945.

Now, think this. Reconquista's article was good but in my opinion Aussie Bobs follow up article was better for seeing a way through the woods.  Stop turning inwards and fighting each other - turn outwards and face the bloody enemy.