“They were, upon the whole, from the black day when they first entered Europe, the one great anti-human specimen of humanity. Wherever they went, a broad line of blood marked the track behind them, and as far as their dominion reached, civilisations disappeared from view…”  Gladstone.

David Cameron and the Drive to Destruction

David Cameron’s support for the entrance of Moslem Turkey into Europe is an instance of the suicidal rush of our Political Class which seemingly cannot wait to see the end of two millennia of Western Christian Civilisation. According to Cameron, Turkey would form a ‘bridge’ or a solidifying force between East and West. Well, it would certainly be that – a bridge over which millions of Turks would pour into Europe. And not just Turks but the millions of others who would enter via  Turkey’s porous borders. This development would of course completely demolish what remains of European Christian Europe under a torrent of Moslem aliens. Cameron thinks that as economies level out, there would be less movement of peoples. But in the case of Turkey and Britain and the rest of Europe, that time is decades away.

The Low Average IQ of Turkish People 

Furthermore there are good reasons for thinking that it may never be reached, unless the populations of Turkey and Europe themselves level out racially, in which case overall wealth levels will decline. Lynn and Vanhanen showed that the wealth of a country is directly related to its mean IQ. The mean IQ of Turks is 90 (Flynn effect adjusted 93) with that of the UK as 100. Turkish immigrants have a mean IQ of 88; in Turkish children it is 85. [Lynn and Vanhanen ‘IQ and the Wealth of Nations’].

 Just Accept It. We’re Done for Anyway?

                                                              Constantine Paleologus

The Last Christian Emperor of Byzantium who died defending Constantinople (now Istanbul) against the Turks

‘Ah well’, some may shrug, ‘Europe is already finished. It is already likely to become dominated by Islam anyway thanks to the ongoing treachery and stupidity of our Political Class whose idea of protecting the interests of their own people is to dispossess and obliterate them and blacken their memory. So why struggle against Turkey?’ This though really would be the counsel of weakness and of despair. The barbarians may well be within the gates but we should resist to the end, if there is an end, just as in 1453 the last Christian Byzantine Emperor Constantine Palaeologus proudly rejected the demand by the besieging Turkish hordes that he surrender his capital city Constantinople, now Istanbul and save his life and died defending it. How different and noble the faith, courage and defiance of Palaeologus was to the attitudes of creeps like Cameron today.

                                                 The Fall of Christian Constantinople to the Turks

David Cameron the 'Progressive'

                                                                               Dripping Wet

As a self - proclaimed ‘progressive’ Cameron must think that the unity of the West with the Moslem world is a step on the road to the gradual unity of humanity.  The unstoppable march of Globalisation under the influence of technological developments such as the internet will inevitably bring about the dissolution of all tiresome local obstacles to Oneness such as Nations, Peoples, Cultures and Religions which are supported only by ignorant 'racists,' 'fascists,' 'nazis,' 'extremists' etc etc. These peoples and their civilisations  will it seems (the details are necessarily unclear) dissolve into an undifferentiated sludge. In short, not Utopia, but a nightmare.

‘Reason’ …

Such Liberal ‘Progressives’ argue that Western Civilisation is not about the People who built Europe or the Christian Religion of the West which inspired the very best of their Civilisation, but about the Enlightenment; the 18^th Century movement which rejected tradition and the authority of Christianity in particular and tried to rely on ‘Reason’ instead.  They put aside or are ignorant of the fact that European faith in Reason is actually a product of Christianity and that European Civilisational norms are essentially 'Christianity clarifed by Reason' as ex- Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir Ali once put it.

Thinking that  ‘Reason’ is the essence of Europe Civilisation and that it is  universal, they can see no fundamental objection to Europe joining Turkey or anywhere else come to that. 'Progressive'  thought says that Turkey should join Europe and so it very well might if the European masses  cannot summon up the enough self -preservative instinct to reject the self-destructive dictates of their so-called 'representatives.' 

 …. or Nothingness

However, ‘Reason’ stripped of Christianity in an attempt at universalisation has brought much grief to the West and everywhere where its influence has spread in the  form of ‘Progressivism’, Marxism and other wretched utopian ideologies.  The ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’ of the French Revolution quickly descended into the Revolutionary ‘Terror’ and the whole episode has spawned the most viciously bloodthirsty and oppressive Regimes in human history.

Seeing  that naked ‘Reason has not brought the good life, the nihilist Left has simply scrapped it. Apparently there is no such thing. This strand of the Left  rightly identifies it as a function of Western Civilisation, which is enough to damn it in the eyes of those who want to ascribe all the world's ills to whiteness and claim that one culture is as as good as the next. It is claimed by these people that we simply construct our own realities and so Race, Religions and Cultures  do not really exist. If they don’t then our perceptions of them can be changed – by Leftists , that is, with enough coercion.

 … Lead to Turkey in the EU

Either way, by Enlightenment ‘Reason’ as favoured by ‘Progressive’ Liberals or Nothingness as favoured by ‘Progressive’ Leftists,  there can be no justification for Turkey and by extension any other country from joining the EU as a stepping stone on the way to the Progressive’s homogenised Utopia. The disappearance of our country, our culture, our way of life, our very selves as a People  – these are minor considerations in the great scheme of World Oneness. Thus the sheer unfeeling, inhuman, shocking horror of what is planned for us by these people and their repellent ideologies is revealed.

No David Cameron, it is You who Misunderstands Islam.

According to Cameron, those who oppose the entrance of Turkey into the EU wilfully misunderstand the nature of Islam. No we don’t, Mr Cameron. On the contrary, it is you who misunderstands its nature. You appear to have swallowed whole the myth of Islamic Tolerance  

And no, we aren’t ‘prejudiced.’ Our opinions are solidly rooted in facts whilst yours are those of the typical western progressive Islamophile who sees Islam and Turkey through the optimistic spectacles of western liberalism and opposition to it as mere bigotry. Bigots who cannot see the nice, kind nature of true Islam, the underlying Oneness of things and the need drive towards it as superior people like yourself do.

Failing to see the Truth about Islam

People like Cameron who are themselves often either agnostic or atheistically inclined, simply cannot comprehend the mindset of those who do have a strong faith. They also refuse to believe that there exists a religion which explicitly advocates violence and dissimulation towards non-believers. They explain away such difficulties which to stand in the way of the view of religions as essentially similar by saying, as Cameron has done, that  Islam is ‘misunderstood.’ They do this because ironically this behaviour is so contrary to the teaching of Jesus Christ (without however Christianity's views on man's sinful nature) which still  lies behind their own attitudes in however an attenuated or perverted a form, however secular and ‘ enlightened’  they might think themselves to  be personally.

In Islam of course, It is Allah who decrees what is right and what is wrong. If Allah decrees that beheading, enslaving or simply subjugating non-believers by force or dissimulation is  good, then it is so.

Nietzsche: 'When you ditch Christianity you are not entitled to hold on to its moral teaching'.

Getting back to our atheistic liberals and leftists who see Islam through the prism of perverted  Christianity which leads to them to  refuse to believe  that it is anything other than benign,  Nietzsche pointed out that atheism implies that there is no morality - one that demands that 'I must do this or not do that come what may,' that is. All that exists, he thought,  are the ethics of the will to Power. This being the case, people may adhere to these if they are so inclined. If not so inclined there is no higher power or imperative that dictates they should, if they can get away with it. Similarly, if we think that our moral impulses arise from  universal human 'intuition's', what is there that dictates that we should take any notice of these if it isn't convenient?  Answer: Nothing whatsoever.

Joeph Stalin and Adolph Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao -they knew this. Thugs in sink estates know, or at least sense it, as do ever-widening circles in our increasingly unpleasant society.  David Cameron and dim Western Liberals who think that human beings are naturally 'good' hide  from themselves the fact that they are not entitled to hold the view that Islam  - or anything else, come to that - should be benign in a Christian sense.

Turkey has no claim to be called European

Which brings us to Turkey. Turkey is an Asiatic, Moslem country whose claim to be of Europe rests solely on its possession  of the small portion of territory adjoining Istanbul, once called Constantinople when it was the capital of Greek Christian Byzantium,  the remnant of a once extensive empire in Europe.

 ‘I studied the Koran a great deal.  I came away from that study with conviction that....there have been few religions as deadly to Man as that of Muhammad.’ – Alexis de Tocqueville

Islamic Turkey lacked the benefit not only of Christianity but of everything that flowed from it, including modern Science, Technology, the Industrial Revolution,  the separation of Church and State and the growth of  Democracy and so on. In so far as it has these at all it had to import them because its own Islamic culture was incapable of providing them.  It missed out on the benefits of the Western Enlightenment while Islam supplied the indifference to bloodletting that religionless  ‘Reason’  supplied the West.

And Islam continues to supply this attitude  towards non-Believers, because it is a religion which was founded on violence. This aspect must and does thoroughly infuse Moslem culture however much purblind Western Islamophiles shut their eyes to it, and however much peace there may be within Islamic societies and (for the time being) communities in the West and elsewhere. It is in the background of the thinking and the assumptions of even the most peaceable  Moslems in the same way  as the  and love of neighbour of Jesus is, however faintly, in the bones of even the worst of those brought up in Christianity. 

The Example of ‘The Perfect Man’ - Mohammed

The history of how its founder, the ‘prophet’ Mohammed personally led his followers in armed attacks on non believers in the effort to spread his message, enslaved or executed  prisoners, murdered a whole Jewish tribe, expropriating their property and raping their women and ordered conquered populations who would not submit to be deliberately humiliated and treated like milch cows for the Jizya tax, ought to be too well known to rehearse here. (Cameron and those like him would profit by the study of it though). The following quotation from Serge Trifkovic, echoed in many other histories of Islam, must suffice:-

 The 'Prophet' Mohammed

‘Muhammed’s practice and constant encouragement of bloodshed are unique in the history of religions. Murder, pillage, rape and more murder are in the Kuran, and in the traditions ‘seem to have impressed his followers with a profound belief in the value of bloodshed as opening the gates of Paradise and prompted countless Muslim Governors, Caliphs and Viziers to refer to Muhammed’s example to justify their mass killings, lootings and destruction'.(Ibn Warraq [1995] p. 349) ‘Kill, kill the unbelievers wherever you find them’ is an injunction both unambiguous and powerful.’ (‘The Sword of the Prophet’ [2002] p51) 

The Turks have followed the Prophet’s Example. Why shouldn’t the History of the Turks in Turkey be a Model for  Moslems in Europe?

It is fair to say that the Turks have not been deficient in following the example of the Prophet and the words of the Koran in their own dealings with non – believers. Their history from the fall of Constantinople to the present day is one of the ethnic cleansing over time of Asia Minor. The Turks, an originally nomadic people from the Central Asian steppes entered an area which was part of  the Christian  Byzantine Empire and 40% Christian and which is now  ruled by Turkey and almost totally Muslim. The intervening centuries saw the subjugation and elimination of the non-muslim peoples including the Jews. There were sporadic massacres of Christians and others right up to and including the last century with the genocide of the Armenians and Assyrians during and after the First World War and the destruction in the 1920’s of the Greek City of Smyrna (now Izmir). This was  a cosmopolitan Mediterranean  town resembling Nice or Cannes in an area which had been Greek since the days of Homer, millennia ago. It was burned by the army of the secularist Ataturk and its population was butchered, many being driven quite literally into the sea.  Tens of thousands of civilians died.

The Turks and the Kurds

Most recently Turkey has been displaying its usual ruthlessness in its attitudes to its Kurdish minority in Eastern Turkey. The Economist of 18^th December 2008 reported that at least 44 000 people had died up to that point in this conflict.  It also reported that ‘ethnic tensions are erupting in western parts of Turkey as well’ and that  ‘The Kurds remain a huge problem for the Turks'. The Turks, of course are huge problem for the Kurds.

Motivation is all…

So we have on the one hand a secularised West where extreme individualism, cultural relativism and all the other malignant viruses of Left –Liberalism, hand in hand uncoincidentally with the declining grip of Christian faith, have weakened the resolve to resist. On the other there is a country with a huge, poor, demographically young population which except for secularised westernised cosmopolitans in a few  cities is verging on Islamic fundamentalism, kept in check only by the army. A check which, ironically would have to be removed as a condition of entry if Turkey were ever to get into the EU.

When hordes of these people, ready to breed, descend on Europe and Britain and in particular to avail themselves of our benefit system which we ourselves are beginning to realise we cannot afford for ourselves, whose will is going to prevail? Whose belief system will triumph? Will it be the feeble liberalism of David Cameron and his ilk and the ageing European populations, their desire to procreate weakened by welfare statism and atheistical materialist selfishness, or will it be the strong will of Islam and the many low-IQ and fertile Moslems?

What do you think?