Unless of course the victim is white

Seriously, where is Noor Ramjanally?  This guy has caused a lot of grief for a lot of people whilst tarnishing the good name of the British National Party.  He must be found, tried and if found guilty, punished for his crimes.

What did he do?  Well he was the moslem who "allegedly" (rofl) claimed he had been first threatened by British National Party people, firebombed and then later claimed to have been kidnapped by some of their members and taken for what he thought was a final walk in the woods.

The whole story was laughable from the start and you can read the background here, here and here in our old sites archives(please read) but at the time, The Establishment Press wet themselves with excitement as they ripped into the BNP.  The police of course, at first accepted the words of the moslem whose cult instructs them it is ok to lie to the filthy non-believers and refused to talk to BNP councillors in the area, whilst finding time to talk reassure almost every single moslem within the United Kingdom that their hamsters were safe.

But I digress.  This bit about the ongoing trial got me interested:

Ramjanally, a married father of one, stood trial in his absence on Tuesday charged with one count of perverting the course of justice.

The jury were not told why he did not attend court and were warned by Judge Karen Walden-Smith not to carry out independent research.

What I want to know is why the jury were not told where the accused was?  Without the jury and the public knowing why Ramalangadingdong did not attend, will only lead them to speculate that he has done a runner to another country or perhaps just decided that washing his hair was a better way of spending his day rather than facing up to British Justice.

And again, by what right does the Judge have to tell people not to carry out indpendent research?  If the defendant has done a runner than surely it is the duty of all British Citizens in helping the police locate the fugitive.