I wonder how many white Americans know that if they were attacked by a gang of Blacks, Hispanics or Asians, who beat them to the ground and then set about them with machetes, Clubs and bats, while shouting “We hate you you white [expletive] Cracker, we are doing this to you because we hate you and your whole [expletive] white race!” their attackers could not be charged with a hate crime. Even if the gang then pulled out guns and fired a dozen bullets into their heads while screaming “We hate you, hate you, we hate you!” Their murder would still not be a hate crime.

They could be murdered, raped, tortured, even dismembered alive, but, no matter how much actual hate was involved in their dispatch from this earth, it would still not count as a hate crime.

Meanwhile, however, the act of tugging a headscarf, could well be a hate crime even if no physical injury occurred. That is provided, of course, that it was not a heterosexual, white Christian wearing the headscarf at the time it was tugged, in that case, it would not be a hate crime, even if the headscarf tugging were accompanied by an assault with a 50 pound mallet.

An earlier post by Sir Percival linked to an article on the Voice Online website. The article written by the black journalist and famously anti-white racist Darkus Howe was a sneering and hate fuelled diatribe asserting the fait accompli which is how the enemies of the native British population now seek to portray the multi racial nightmare which has been forced upon our benighted nation without ever allowing the us a democratic vote.

This claim is usually made with the smug malevolence of a rapist reminding his victim of her rape, and Howe certainly stuck to tradition in this respect, as the reader could all but visualise the bile dribbling into his keyboard and mingling poisonously with the toxic residue of his earlier work as he typed.

As I pointed out in the comments section of Sir Percival's posting, I noticed the following line lurking menacingly amongst Howe's corrosive prose:
 

"It is clear to me that at this point in time the path out of recession can only powered by new and huge injection of immigrant labour."

Given that the huge injection of immigration has already taken place over the last ten years, during which time we have seen the most comprehensive invasion of sovereign European nation in history, and at the end of which we find ourselves in the midst of the worst recession ever recorded, my fist reaction was that Howe must have written the line as some cruel and tasteless jest. However, upon reading further, it became clear that the deluded and vengeful old fool most probably believed the piffle he composed.

Opinion is split as to whether it was Goebells or indeed Lenin who first said that a lie if repeated often enough becomes a truth, however it seems they both said something very similar, and that device forms the foundation upon which the entire argument in favour of a multicultural, multi-racial and diverse society is built.

We all know the lies, but I will mention just a few:

There are a few remaining African based blogs which continue to report the truth of what is happening in Southern Africa. I luv South Africa, Ne Ultra, Afrikaner Broadcasting, Die Nuwe Suid Afrika, Cape Independence Movement, Tia Mysoa, and Sokwanele (This is Zimbabwe) still post harrowing accounts of what life has become. However, it is becoming progressively more difficult and dangerous for them to do so, especially for those living in South Africa and Zimbabwe.

Perhaps the most successful of all these blogs was “Why South Africa Sucks” which, over the years has achieved phenomenal popularity and internet traffic on account of its willingness to “speak truth to power” and tell politically incorrect and uncomfortable truths.

I see that my friend the Green Arrow has already commented on Home Secretary Alan Johnson's speech at the Royal Society, in which he appeared acknowledged that the Labour government, together with successive previous governments have handled the issue of immigration badly. The Green Arrow is of course quite correct to be sceptical of ex-trade union leader Johnson's apparent Damascene conversion, this is after all the man who, as the Green Arrow points out, said only four months ago that he was more than happy living in a multicultural society, and, famously that he did “not lie awake at night worrying about a population of 70million”.

We would, of course, be mad to believe that Johnson is doing anything other than seeking to deceive the public in the hope of reducing the potential vote for the BNP. For a senior member of the current government to claim that they are no longer in favour of mass immigration is as credible as serial rapist declaring that he has gone gay, their past record exposes their lie.