The big debate about how much money we (Rich) nations are going to give to the (Poor) nations to allow (Compensate) them for the as yet unproven Climate Change paradox has ended in fiasco.

After two weeks of jollies and no doubt much fornication, the world’s leaders have agreed to disagree.

Obama, the world leader in waiting, has coerced our Prime minister to enslave us even more by promising £1.5 billion of our children’s money to support people that we do not need, and who infact despise us.

Meanwhile Obama has ensured that all his friends in high places will actually benefit personally from this complete sham.

On the other side of the coin and as yet completely unheard, are the billions of humans who would actually benefit from climate change. Most of these have to endure terrible cold and sparse sustenance because of the climate as it is.

We in Britain if subjected to just a 2 degree average rise in temperatures, would probably never experience frost again. Grass and vegetables would grow all year around vastly improving agriculture, and viral infections like influenza would become less common. Our massive heating bills would vanish and we would all be far healthier.

Why should we have to care about what is happening to countries on the other side of the world where the people generally breed like rabbits? It is abundantly clear that all their social and food problems are because there are too many of them and they just cannot support themselves.

It is common sense to say that nature will look after itself. If we continue to throw aid at those who are incapable or unwilling to help themselves then we are creating a monstrous legacy for those that follow us.