Chemical Dumbing Down And Its Consequences - A Case For Mitigation?
This is probably going to be a contraversial argument, where i claim someone who openly admits and is known to have carried out a crime, may well be innocent. So in the interests of justice i put forward my opinion.
The case of Jessica Davies, niece of the junior defence minister appears to be an open and shut case, she has not denied the crime, she has declared herself a monster.
The newspaper comments sections are full of vitriol for this hideous crime carried out by this deranged woman,
but before we condemn her too, let's look a little deeper at events.
It is the belief of a growing number of people that the ruling elite are using drugs, not just as a means of making a profit, but as an actual means of control over society.
This is one of the greatest battles of humanity, the battle between the ruling elites for control over the masses. The masses, the proletariat being largely unaware of the war they are involved in.
There is a good reason why we are not told about this war, if the masses ever realised what was going on there would be a revolution and the ruling elites would lose, there are millions of us and only a few thousand of them. On that basis that a picture paints a thousand words, here is a good idea of what the establishment want.
Pop Up
Embed Embed this video on your site
It was Aldous Huxley who prophesised in his book "Brave New World" that the ruling elites would use drugs (and propaganda) as a means of acquiring and maintaining this control over the masses. Huxley states, "the policies are less important than the spin all that is needed is money, and the candidate can be coached to look sincere".
This is why for example Obama, Blair and Cameron are such "polished performers", without having any real policies, they just get elected on the promise of "hope" or "change" spouted by the likes of Obama or Cameron whilst completely ignoring the common sense reality that if you want prosperity we have to work, we have to build things like cars, ships, steel and electronics.
So here we are, 2010, the British National Party trying desperatly to tell the masses if they want real prosperity and freedom we have to get our industry back up and running, and we have to tear up the treaties. Cameron on the other hand is not offering anything specific, just that he will cut the deficit, and that post Lisbon he will "not let matters rest there".
The masses will walk mesmerised by Cameron's smarm to the precipice completely ignore common sense, they all know we have to begin manufacturing, stop dumbing down our education system and regain our Sovereignty not by "not letting matters rest there" but by tearing up the treaties.
What's going on?
I think there are several important things at play here, one that human beings have a slight tendency too follow leaders, in medicine and psychiatry, this can be known as white coat syndrome, put a white coat on someone and they become believable, experiments of this nature have been done and it is now well documented.
The masses mesmerised by percieved authority are lured hypnotically to follow leaders, this is why a pop star who knows absolutely nothing about climatology can join the Global Warming scam and millions of youngsters will join them unthinkingly.
If it said on the BBC news that scientists had confirmed that Global Warming is real and that unless the people hand over their money to Gordon Brown, add baby polar bears, kittens, babies and ducklings to the mix and the establishment can extract even more wealth from us to transfer into offshore accounts.
Come on people, how many times have you fallen for that starving black African con? We have poured trillions into that continent, that continent is one of the richest on the planet, it has Gold, Diamonds, Uranium and Silver, the African people don't need our money, what they need is western leaders who will stop stealing their wealth from them.
Who owns the Diamond mines in Africa, Nigeria's oil, the Gold? It's not the African people, it's us, we in the west, De Beers, Shell and BP, the very fact that few, if any African leaders point this out shows they are in on the scam to impoverish their own people and steal their wealth.
As in many parts of the world now, Africa is ruled by corrupt puppet dictators selling out their own people for Gold bars held in Swiss bank accounts, and what about the committed Comunists in Westminster and Whitehall, do they complain about the proletarian exploitation being carried out, no of course not, because despite what they spout, Communism is about wealth and despotic control over the lives of others.
Gordon Brown claims to be a Socialist but has he ever condemned Shell or BP for their exploitation of Africa's resources, has he as a Socialist ever suggested that the African Diamond mines should perhaps be owned by the Africans?
Cameron et al, talk of redistribution but have they ever mentioned the vast fortunes held by people like the Rothschild's, whose estimated net wealth is said to be in the region of between £100 trillion and £500 trillion, why not?
Africa doesn't need aid, it needs a BNP Government in Britain and Ron Paul as President of the US. It's all a con we the masses are by and large mesmerised by these frauds, all Cameron has to do is go on tv and say "I will give you a cast iron guarantee to hold a referendum on the European Union" and millions will fall for it, because no one looks behind the curtain.
So what does all this have to do with Jessica Davies? Well, as Huxley prophesised in his book Brave New World, there is good evidence that the ruling elites are using drugs to attain yet greater control over our lives. What is the first thing they do to children after being born, they pump them full of mercury, mercury is a known neurotoxin to dumb down the population.
Pop Up
Embed Embed this video on your site
Where is the link to the Jessica Davies case? Well, the Daily Mail article says she was on anti-depressants at the time, which may have influenced her behaviour.
Going back to what i said earlier, we have a tendency to follow leaders, in medicine and psychiatry, the well documented white coat syndrome.
Many murderers and criminals try to rationalise their behaviour look at Stalin and Mao they rationalised their crimes so as to make the criminal act acceptable to themselves. this is illustrated in the film Hannibal, Hannibal Lector kills and eats one of the musicians in the Vienna Philiharmonic as a way of improving the Orchestra, now Jessica Davies, quite naturally her doctor no doubt would have told her the drugs she was taking were perfectly safe, of course white coat syndrome would dictate to her that these drugs would be perfectly safe with minimal side effects.
A little more digging however reveals that in 7 out of the past 12 school shootings in the US the perpretator has either been on anti depressants or withdrawing from their use.
In addition, although the pharmaceutical companies deny any link, anti depressants have been linked to many hundreds if not thousands of other suicides and murders.
Pop Up
Embed Embed this video on your site
Is this why she made the sane announcement when the police arrived? "I am a monster" eg i must have been a monster to have committed such a monstrous act, remember real criminals don't see themselves as such.
Pop Up
Embed Embed this video on your site
She also states that the crime is so monstrous that "I dare not ask for forgiveness". This woman is not a monster, she is as sane as you or i, devastated and traumatised by what she did, from what i do know she did indeed kill, these drugs are being used on society in increasing numbers, not as medication but as a means of increasing the control of the elites over the masses, but i believe there is some grounds to say she may be innocent, just who are the real monsters, the elites drugging humanity or their poor victims like Jessica and Olivier? This article should also illustrate why courts should determine justice and not mob rule.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 16 January 2010 13:41 )




















