Created: Tuesday, 23 February 2010 07:11
Author: Aussie Bob |
Those parts of the world who do not read newspapers to get information has learned that the leadership of the English Defence League have been arrested by British police, their homes searched and their computers taken while families, including young children, were forced to watch on
While many who visit this site have very little good to say about the EDL, I have always seen their appearance as a positive thing. For one, young football fans are not known for their skills as activists or local organisers for political parties so I seriously doubt that they and the BNP are fishing in the same pond. And for two their actions only help show just what results the regime of enforced “Diversity” has had on British cities.
Sure the leadership have been hopelessly naive, but they managed to put thousands of young lads almost totally from the indigenous community into demonstrations where they have seen firsthand the lying and corruption that is at the heart of the modern British political system. Now that the leadership has been arrested for planning peaceful demonstrations that were subsequently attacked by police and state funded “anti-racism” bodies this message will only be driven deeper.
The EDL has helped to keep Islam in the news, a great positive for the BNP, they have also helped the BNP to distance itself from confrontational street politics and help even more with the move to a more electable image.
Sure the EDL do not share the BNP’s views, but really who cares? Anything which lashes out at the PC orthodoxy is a positive for our side, every person who is shown just how undemocratic Britain is because of the EDL is someone who will eventually vote BNP. And for every person who went to an EDL march, countless others wanted to but didn’t.
The best analogy I find is the French revolution. The first protests against the king were actually held by nobles, even after the Tennis court oath and the third estates rebellion the aim was always a constitutional monarchy. It was only when the King was found to be plotting with outside armies who were invading France and then tried to flee was killing him even seriously considered by anyone other than firebrands like Marat, and even then there were many who voted no to this final resort.
Another example is of the peasants and workers of Russia who marched to the Tsars palace and begged him from outside in the snow to be a kinder ruler, the Tsars guards slaughtered them. The families who had to lower their loved ones into the icy ground had their naive illusions about their system shattered fairly quickly, and many others took the lesson as well.
So for us the lesson is that sometimes people need time to see that the wrong options simply don’t work. As long as they are shooting in the right direction, who the hell cares why they are doing it?
People are waking up all over the UK, we should not be angry because they don’t wake up as much as we have, as quickly as we did, these people have to shake off entire lifetimes of propaganda, we should be patient and help them to slowly see the truth.
Created: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 07:14
Author: Aussie Bob |
Islam - just an empty bottle at the end of the day
Brave Sir Anjem Choudary ran away he bravely ran away…
So Islam4UK bottled it again. Not a big surprise there.
The idea that Anjem Choudary would actually try and march with his merry band of clitoris chopping madmen through such sacred and hallowed ground was always absurd, designed only to foster the reaction it did.
The bigger the target and the more outraged that indigenous people got the better publicity for Choudary. I just heard him being quoted on Australian AM radio, its fair to say he is a little famous now.
Let’s be clear here, the only British people who make it on to Australian airwaves are high profile sports people, mindless celebrities [including royalty] and soulless politicians. I assume that Choudary has not yet pulled on a shirt for Chelsea [yet] so he must be in one of the latter categories.
This man has done very well out of his provocative uttering’s. To judge by web chatter he is not a big fish in the hard-line Islamic community, older heads in that scene see him as being a shameless self promoter who does more damage than good.
But from the perspective of the man himself the recent controversy and his backing down have done him quite well. His name and the name of his group are on the lips and in the ears of every young radical Muslim in Britain. This must really annoy the old timers in the mosques, but that’s life fellas, in the age of multimedia promotion simply sticking your head out a minaret and yelling is not the best form of communication anymore.
Anjem Choudary is a chancer; he has gained a little authority through the Sharia courts movement and is currently trying to play that authority into a raging storm of publicity. And helpfully, the media is aiding him.
It’s clear that Choudary probably never intended to march through the town; the highly shaky government looking for populist causes in the run up to an election would never have allowed it. Labour may be in hock to the Islamic block vote, but banning that march would have gained them more votes from every other community in Britain, not just the indigenous community, than they would have lost in the Mosques.
So who are the winners out of this merry farce? This intricate role-play of media, big government Islam and the resistance?
Well Brown has done well because somehow in the oceans of newsprint he has emerged looking like a figure of strength for the first time since he took over the government. That this is at all possible is a testament to the blatant delusion of the media classes in the west, who truly do live in their own world and half believe that they create the world around them.
The media has done well because they have helped to put Anjem Choudary in the limelight again, thus making him a more recognisable figure, and thus more newsworthy the next time he wants publicity. There is nothing journalists like more than create stories for themselves tomorrow. They know Choudary, they know how to contact him and they know he is good for an outrageous quote. Journalists hate actually working for a living. Going out and finding out what is actually happening in the world is not so easy; they much prefer to manufacture the content of their rags themselves. Anjem Choudary and others like him help them to do that.
The various nationalist and anti-islamist groups like the BNP and the EDL got publicity out of the issue in a relatively dry press period for both groups. What’s more both groups managed to get themselves in the news opposing the march of an obvious nutter, pretty hard for the press to spin that against them.
The reason that groups like the BNP are either not named or buried in the news surrounding Anjem Choudary’s cancellation is because the press does not wish to give any group credit where it is deserved. Journalists like taking credit for things, it keeps them feeling warm and helps them to fill the gaping hole where their ethics and soul used to be.
The outcome of this issue has resulted in minor wins to Brown and the BNP, medium wins for the press [who, like stockbrokers or real estate agents, win whatever the outcome] and a major win for Anjem Choudary.
Islam4UK is a marginal group; it has support amongst some hardline Muslims but by no means a huge number. This publicity will attract more young radicalised youths to Anjem Choudary even as it drives away more “respectable” hardline extremists who don’t see much of a point in kicking up a fuss seeing as Islam is winning through the birth canal and colonisation anyway.
So should we applaud Anjem Choudary or not? Personally I say yes. Every time he opens his mouth more indigenous people break through the mirror of lies and deceit about Islam put up by various press and government spin doctors. Every time the government line is shown up as the lie it is should be seen as a victory for common sense, and another turn of the ratchet that will surely one day lead to the downfall of the fascist totalitarianism that is the politically correct worldview.
Created: Thursday, 17 December 2009 08:25
Author: Aussie Bob |
Tax is theft
The BBC does not represent the people who pay its licence fee. The indigenous people’s interests are not served by the BBC yet they are forced to pay for it.
What happens if you refuse to pay? What happens if you refuse to pay any tax?
They give you a fine.
If you refuse to pay that they send around thugs with weapons wearing the uniforms that generations of British people grew up trusting and respecting. If you still refuse to pay for this “service” or the fines they give you for it they will throw you in jail. If, when you are released, you refuse to pay again, the process begins again, ending in a longer jail term.
Created: Sunday, 13 December 2009 07:00
Author: Aussie Bob |
Useful idiots and “Right wing” corporations
BP and Shell, both major oil companies, are also major funders of the climate alarmism conference currently being held in Copenhagen.
The usual line against anyone who questions the need for the entire world to be regulated by international bodies with powers of taxation and enforcement in order to “save the planet” is that such strange weirdoes only exist because the “Fossil fuel industry” is bankrolling them.
You can find this argument used whenever the seriously dodgy foundation of the argument for man made global warming starts being debated. George Monbiot has been whining about it again, desperately trying to repair his tattered faith after the revelations of the climategate scandal.
In the first week of December 2008, blizzards closed roads and schools across northern England and Scotland. Large parts of the UK were blanketed with snow for the third time in the 2008-09 winter. At the same time the UK government's Committee on Climate Change issued its first report on how Britain is to handle the terrifying threat of runaway global warming. Nature certainly has a keen sense of humour. -Ian Plimer
It’s pretty hard to get published in this day and age. As any aspiring writer will tell you, it’s very hard to get a deal without being signed to a literary agent, and the best literary agents only want to sign published authors.
Unless you have a book to call your own and a decent amount of sales under your belt it’s not really very easy to break into the market. If you are trying to publish an authoritative non fiction tome it really does help to have an academic position somewhere along the line. But recently one man had all these things and was still turned down.
Created: Wednesday, 02 December 2009 15:46
Author: Aussie Bob |
What is Jihad?
There seems to be a bit of confusion over what exactly IS referred to by the word ‘Jihad’.
Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and almost every Muslim spokesman tells us that jihad means a ‘peaceful inner struggle’. And while it seems almost improbable that the above personages would be telling the truth, they are.
Jihad DOES mean peaceful inner struggle. The people who tell us this are not exactly lying by their words, but they are certainly lying by omission. If this is more out of ignorance or cunning is of course impossible to say.
Created: Thursday, 07 January 2010 08:10
Author: Aussie Bob |
My friend has an ex roommate who is Iranian. I have met the chap, quite erudite and well educated, a philosopher of sorts with a wry way of looking at the world. He is a foreign student in this country and has just decided to return home.
He comes from a secular family from the urban elites and does not worship Islam in the same fashion as most of his countrymen. He is returning to join the growing insurgency against the Iranian government, and he does not expect to survive.
His has said goodbye to his Australian friends for what he believes is the last ever time. And he has told them of the frenzy amongst the un-Islamised urban classes against the clerical government.
I am not naturally one to often sympathise much with the troubles of ordinary Iranians. I am much more concerned with the fate of my own country, its culture and its people than I am with the conflicts in far away lands about which we know so little.
But I felt myself feeling rather emotional at the thought of this young man, the typical student type with the frame and musculature of a rake and the height of a small table, going off to fight for the betterment of his country and his people.
He could have done what many of his countrymen have and simply settled in my southern sunny land, forgetting the troubles of their people and abandoning them to their fate.
But he chose not to. He chose to fight for their right to a better kind of freedom than that which can be had under a theological dictatorship. He decided to give his life in advance for what is most likely a hopeless cause, for the urban protesters stand against not only their own religious establishment but the great mass of the rural population.
I felt so much envy for the spirit which could ignite the resolve of this young man. The courage of such a small, quiet, scholarly man moves me almost to tears. Where is this courage in our people today? Where has this passion, this animating spirit that drove us to create the greatest civilisation of all time gone?
Can we ever get it back?
I don’t know enough about these revolts against the state power in Iran to really do much else than admire motivations. I know that the urban elites make up a big chunk of the demonstrators and that there is a clerical veneer across the top. But how deep is the veneer?
Created: Wednesday, 09 December 2009 06:46
Author: Aussie Bob |
Stand up and Fight damnit!
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." - Sigmund Freud
"An armed society is a polite society." - Robert Heinlein
"Among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised." - Charlton Heston
Every tyrant and totalitarian in history has made it their business to outlaw private weapons. Ever wonder why? Ever wonder why when there is a mass shooting in the U.S the media in the U.K, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and France [from my personal observations at least, it is probably worldwide] do their utmost to tell us how crazy, evil American “Gun Nuts” insist on private citizens being able to buy firearms?
Created: Thursday, 03 December 2009 05:58
Author: Aussie Bob |
Climate capers
In the world of climate science there has been a bit of a tizzy the last few weeks, although I couldn’t blame you for not knowing, the media seems to be intent on keeping it as quiet as possible. If it was not for a few brave journalists like James Delingpole no-one would even know about it.
Why would scientists cover up science? Imagine
But take a while to use your imagination.
Imagine you have just finished a PHD in climate science.
Chances are it took you a total of about 10 years of post-school study to get there. You watched all your mates go out and get on with their lives, make lots of money in their much more popular fields and settle down, maybe even buying a house.
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 December 2009 02:27 )