They are through the gates.  God help us now.

It all started in the year 610 when Muhammad then aged 40 found himself in a cave looking for spiritual guidance in a place called Hira, just up the road from Mecca. He claimed he had a visitation by the Archangel Gabriel.

Now when Muhammad described the Angel Gabriel as having six hundred wings and whose size covered the horizon, one should question his mental state. Personally I would have thought two wings would have been quite sufficient. By comparison it certainly makes the tales of the Prodigal Son and Bread and Fishes pale into insignificance. What history does not tell us is what exactly what is was that Muhammad, with emphasis on the mad; smoking the day Gabriel gave him that surprise visit or was the hallucinations caused by heat of the day.

It did not end there I’m afraid; he also heard voices instructing him to recite. As he could not read, Angel Gabriel revealed to him the teachings that would later be compiled into the Qur’an.

A mischievous or malicious accusation of racism can find one incarcerated in jail much like the Spanish Inquisition in 1478 when many true and faithful Christians, because of the testimony of enemies, rivals, slaves and other low people—and still less appropriate—without tests of any kind, were accused of heresy and were locked up in secular prisons, tortured and condemned like relapsed heretics, deprived of their goods and properties, and given over to the secular arm to be executed, at great danger to their souls, giving a pernicious example and causing scandal to many.

The purging of society of Witches, history informs us, was stopped by King Coloman of Hungary who declared that witch-hunts should cease because witches did not exist; a very enlightened person for his time I might add. "Neighbourhood witches" were the product of neighbourhood tensions, and were found only in self-sufficient serf village communities where the inhabitants largely rely on each other.

Such accusations follow the breaking of some social norm, and any person part of the normal social exchange could potentially fall under suspicion.

Perhaps history does repeat itself. The modern phenomenon of purges is not as the result of superstition but the shame and fear of being a victim of the purge is the same. Times have changed; modern day connotations of charges of enemies of the people are brought by the enrichers who accuse the enriched, and the colonizers that accuse those being colonised of being racists because they object to unwanted ‘cultural enrichment’ by primitive people and to the colonization of their lands.

The political establishment who through self preservation continue to use a contemporary type of inquisition to those opposed to their plan of ethnic dilution and eventual destruction. The powerful, wealthy clergy who through the ages have sexually violated the bodies of young children still have strong political muscle and influence, and like their predecessors preach their bigoted diatribe from the pulpits to the frightened people; they will even throw baseless accusations at political parties and still have the temerity to call themselves God’s disciples.

It has reached a disturbing stage where teachers will accuse a child of racism; one child will even accuse another, purges like inquisitions whether religious or superstitious are designed to keep the peasants in a continual state of concern and controlled servitude. It is only in the private, comfortable sanctuary of one's home and amongst one’s closest friends and out of earshot of strangers that one can be free to speak of their concerns for their future.

We don’t have religious tribunals any more but we do have departments of inquisitors like the EHRC led by an ebony representative of the colonizers and enrichers whose position is the surveillance of the faithful and the punishment of the transgressors. To add insult to injury he even sexually mates with a female of those peasants being colonised. The EHRC’s sole reason for being is to use threats of incarceration and to purge society of the peasants who express resentment to the destruction of their identity and theft of their land.

It has almost reaches a stage of frenzy. But unlike accusations of witches and heretics the purpose of the use of the word racist is not of the result of superstition but of something much more sinister, the reshaping of Europe.

Never in our nations long and glorious history have treachery and sedition been so blatant by our traitorous leaders. Never has a whole ethnic society whose resentment to being overwhelmed and discriminated against been silenced by a comparatively few people.

The modern heretic is ‘THE RACIST’. That is title that is ascribed to anyone who openly opposes their loss of their identity, their culture and the deliberate overwhelming of their homeland by violent peoples of cultures so alien to theirs, and of the violation of their basic human rights of self determination by government decree.

We should not  dismiss too lightly the founding of a Potential for the United Nationalist Nations (UNN). If we attempt to fight this fight on our own we will NOT survive. With the relentless numbers of migrants flocking to this country the demographers have crunched the figures, time lines of the year 2025 or 2050 are forecast when the ethnic people of this country will be in the minority and the peoples of Europe will also be staring at the deliberate ethnic and cultural suicide of their people, by then we would have reached the point of NO RETURN without the retaliation of frightening proportions. End of story.

We cannot wait until 2025 and then decide if the number crunchers were correct, we do not have the luxury of time. Out leaders are selling the freedoms of the people of Europe piece by piece for what and to who, only history will tell.

Great Britain is ruled by a European consortium, a number who are more in debt to the bankers than we are. We are ruled by consensus, and we do not have self government. At election time who do you vote for? You are voting for a person who will represent this country at a talkfest in Brussels.

The consortium's leaders such as Silvio Belusconi whose sexual dalliances have captivated the attention of the Italians has yet to avoid going to jail for tax fraud because of good luck and an able defence team.

I noted that on page 29 of the current issue of “This England” magazine, a magazine I have been a subscriber of for many years, a list of 21 pressure groups and one political party the UKIP, who are campaigning to withdraw from the EUSSR.

What was jarringly notable by its absence in the list was the British National Party. Lets us look at this anomaly a little closer. I realised that maybe apart from the UKIP all of the pressure groups listed were one issue groups, but all were vehemently anti-EUSSR, so why was not the BNP listed?

The magazine is a pot-pourri of all things ‘English’. It holds sacred everything that made Great Britain what it was, NOT WHAT IT IS TODAY. It recounts stories of great English writers, painters, heroes, actors of stage screen and radio and it abounds with information on English history, its fauna and Flora.

Marxism for the masses

I would be extremely annoyed if my young child of innocent, tender years was being taught about same sex ‘marriages’, same sex relationships and sexual foreplay cumulating in the sex act by liberally enlightened teachers who are required to follow closely an extreme far left Socialist, Marxist inspired teaching syllabus. I would most certainly question why my child was being read fairy stories and shown picture books which have been specifically commissioned as a teaching aid for no other purpose than to reinforce a child’s belief that sexual aberrations and perversions are quite ‘normal’

My wife and I would be even more incensed if this disgusting practice was being used in some cases as a bizarre excuse to covertly satisfy a perverted teacher’s sexual gratification while teaching young children about subjects which is solely the responsibility of their parents. The final insult would be if these subjects were being taught to my child without my permission. I would also be a peeved if my child was being taught by a person who had some obvious conflict with his/her gender, don’t ask me why.

For instance would I as a parent be informed that my Christian child was being given meat sandwiches in the school canteen consisting of meat butchered to a Middle Eastern Halal tradition from an animal that was slaughtered by the most cruellest of methods, originated by a people of a superstitious, primitive desert cult practised over a thousand years ago and being condoned by our government in a Christian country today and fed to Christian school children?

I have this disturbing picture of a wild eyed, terrified animal being forcibly restrained before having its throat cut and while in excruciating pain slowly bleed to death. I ask, would I and my wife be consulted or even asked for our permission as parents if the teachers were planning to take our children to an alien and hostile place of worship whose cult follower’s rock backward and forwards whilst learning by ROTE their disturbed prophet’s teachings to the letter?