Responding to the news that the chairman of the British National Party, Nick Griffin MEP had made a guest appearance at a General Election fund raising evening in Markyate, that raised almost £2,000 for the local campaign, one of David Cameron's thugs from the UAF, Mark Smith said;

"I think it's very telling the fact that they have to do their fundraising in secret. These are the kind of politics they have to conceal and keep behind closed doors - it's indicative of their position.

"Anti-rascists broadcast their message loud and proud, but fascists have to keep their ideas behind closed doors.

"We are going to have a very public anti-fascist campaign. We will ensure the anti-fascist message is loud and clear and fascists are not given the oxygen of publicity."

Let us have a look now at what happens when the UAF decide to ensure that the BNP "are not given the oxygen of publicity".

As you can see in the above image, one of their sites declares that "The Hunt is On" when trying to locate the location of a previous BNP fund raising meeting that was held in Leigh.

As you can see from the next posting(above) on a UAF supporting site,  they have discovered the venue of the Leigh meeting and make its details widely know to all their marxist and mad dog supporters of the UAF.

Pop Up Embed Embed this video on your site

The Telegraph said;

"Muslim Europe: the demographic time bomb transforming our continent"

"The EU is facing an era of vast social change, and few politicians are taking notice"

"Europe's low white birth rate, coupled with faster multiplying migrants, will change fundamentally what we take to mean by European culture and society."

The Full Article was written and produced before Free Speech was banned in Britain and the EU under IMRAX

Since then, no British politician except Mr Nick Griffin MEP, has spoken about these dangers, and despite many other politicians speak about these dangers in Australia, America and Europe, this government, with its adherence to the IMRAX code, REFUSES to tell you the truth about your country, whilst David Cameron himself, a candidate for Ministerial Office, supports the UAF which is permeating LIES and PROPAGANDA about the British National Party and Mr Nick Griffin and has attacked an innocent man with a claw-hammer because he dared to hold a conscience for his country and have the audacity to speak the truth about ISLAM.

The Telegraph Wrote:

Britain and the rest of the European Union are ignoring a demographic time bomb: a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades, and almost no policy-makers are talking about it.

The numbers are startling. Only 3.2 per cent of Spain's population was foreign-born in 1998. In 2007 it was 13.4 per cent. Europe's Muslim population has more than doubled in the past 30 years and will have doubled again by 2015. In Brussels, the top seven baby boys' names recently were Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine and Hamza.

Europe's low white birth rate, coupled with faster multiplying migrants, will change fundamentally what we take to mean by European culture and society. The altered population mix has far-reaching implications for education, housing, welfare, labour, the arts and everything in between. It could have a critical impact on foreign policy: a study was submitted to the US Air Force on how America's relationship with Europe might evolve. Yet EU officials admit that these issues are not receiving the attention they deserve.

Jerome Vignon, the director for employment and social affairs at the European Commission, said that the focus of those running the EU had been on asylum seekers and the control of migration rather than the integration of those already in the bloc. "It has certainly been underestimated - there is a general rhetoric that social integration of migrants should be given as much importance as monitoring the inflow of migrants." But, he said, the rhetoric had rarely led to policy.

The countries of the EU have long histories of welcoming migrants, but in recent years two significant trends have emerged. Migrants have come increasingly from outside developed economies, and they have come in accelerating numbers.

The growing Muslim population is of particular interest. This is not because Muslims are the only immigrants coming into the EU in large numbers; there are plenty of entrants from all points of the compass. But Muslims represent a particular set of issues beyond the fact that atrocities have been committed in the West in the name of Islam.

America's Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, part of the non-partisan Pew Research Center, said in a report: "These [EU] countries possess deep historical, cultural, religious and linguistic traditions. Injecting hundreds of thousands, and in some cases millions, of people who look, speak and act differently into these settings often makes for a difficult social fit."

How dramatic are the population changes? Everyone is aware that certain neighbourhoods of certain cities in Europe are becoming more Muslim, and that the change is gathering pace. But raw details are hard to come by as the data is sensitive: many countries in the EU do not collect population statistics by religion.

EU numbers on general immigration tell a story on their own. In the latter years of the 20th century, the 27 countries of the EU attracted half a million more people a year than left. "Since 2002, however," the latest EU report says, "net migration into the EU has roughly tripled to between 1.6 million and two million people per year."

The increased pace has made a nonsense of previous forecasts. In 2004 the EU thought its population would decline by 16 million by 2050. Now it thinks it will increase by 10 million by 2060. Britain is expected to become the most populous EU country by 2060, with 77 million inhabitants. Right now it has 20 million fewer people than Germany. Italy's population was expected to fall precipitously; now it is predicted to stay flat.

The study for the US Air Force by Leon Perkowski in 2006 found that there were at least 15 million Muslims in the EU, and possibly as many as 23 million. They are not uniformly distributed, of course. According to the US's Migration Policy Institute, residents of Muslim faith will account for more than 20 per cent of the EU population by 2050 but already do so in a number of cities. Whites will be in a minority in Birmingham by 2026, says Christopher Caldwell, an American journalist, and even sooner in Leicester. Another forecast holds that Muslims could outnumber non-Muslims in France and perhaps in all of western Europe by mid-century. Austria was 90 per cent Catholic in the 20th century but Islam could be the majority religion among Austrians aged under 15 by 2050, says Mr Caldwell.

Projected growth rates are a disputed area. Birth rates can be difficult to predict and migrant numbers can ebb and flow. But Karoly Lorant, a Hungarian economist who wrote a paper for the European Parliament, calculates that Muslims already make up 25 per cent of the population in Marseilles and Rotterdam, 20 per cent in Malmo, 15 per cent in Brussels and Birmingham and 10 per cent in London, Paris and Copenhagen.

Recent polls have tended to show that the feared radicalisation of Europe's Muslims has not occurred. That gives hope that the newcomers will integrate successfully. Nonetheless, second and third generations of Muslims show signs of being harder to integrate than their parents. Policy Exchange, a British study group, found that more than 70 per cent of Muslims over 55 felt that they had as much in common with non-Muslims as Muslims. But this fell to 62 per cent of 16-24 year-olds.

The population changes are stirring unease on the ground. Europeans often tell pollsters that they have had enough immigration, but politicians largely avoid debate.

France banned the wearing of the hijab veil in schools and stopped the wearing of large crosses and the yarmulke too, so making it harder to argue that the law was aimed solely at Muslims. Britain has strengthened its laws on religious hatred. But these are generally isolated pieces of legislation.

Into the void has stepped a resurgent group of extreme-Right political parties, among them the British National Party, which gained two seats at recent elections to the European Parliament. Geert Wilders, the Dutch politician who speaks against Islam and was banned this year from entering Britain, has led opinion polls in Holland.

The Pew Forum identified the mainstream silence in 2005: "The fact that [extreme parties] have risen to prominence at all speaks poorly about the state and quality of the immigration debate. [Scholars] have argued that European elites have yet to fully grapple with the broader issues of race and identity surrounding Muslims and other groups for fear of being seen as politically incorrect."

The starting point should be greater discussion of integration. Does it matter at all? Yes, claims Mr Vignon at the European Commission. Without it, polarisation and ghettoes can result. "It's bad because it creates antagonism. It antagonises poor people against other poor people: people with low educational attainment feel threatened," he says.

The EU says employment rates for non-EU nationals are lower than for nationals, which holds back economic advancement and integration. One important reason for this is a lack of language skills. The Migration Policy Institute says that, in 2007, 28 per cent of children born in England and Wales had at least one foreign-born parent. That rose to 54 per cent in London. Overall in 2008, 14.4 per cent of children in primary schools had a language other than English as their first language.

Muslims, who are a hugely diverse group, have so far shown little inclination to organise politically on lines of race or religion. But that does not mean their voices are being ignored. Germany started to reform its voting laws 10 years ago, granting certain franchise rights to the large Turkish population. It would be odd if that did not alter the country's stance on Turkey's application to join the EU. Mr Perkowski's study says: "Faced with rapidly growing, disenfranchised and increasingly politically empowered Muslim populations within the borders of some of its oldest and strongest allies, the US could be faced with ever stronger challenges to its Middle East foreign policies."

Demography will force politicians to confront these issues sooner rather than later. Recently, some have started to nudge the debate along. Angel Gurría, the OECD secretary-general, said in June: "Migration is not a tap that can be turned on and off at will. We need fair and effective migration and integration policies; policies that work and adjust to both good economic times and bad ones."

rugfish Wrote:

Cameron, you are a Prize Prick of the highest order!

Pop Up Embed Embed this video on your site RATE

When the authors of Mills and Boon stories write to a formula, they find there are a finite number of plots they can employ. The same applies to all fiction writers. The names may change but the plots are repeated, though they may differ subtly, but nevertheless they are still repeated. Which brings me to the accepted notion that history repeats itself? We have seen despots, dictators and madmen slide into oblivion, we have seen crooked and corrupt governments come and go. We have seen great Empires crumble and dynasties disappear. It is history repeating itself.

Today we live in troubled times but troubled times are not the reserve of modern day Britain or indeed the whole of Europe. All throughout history people have experienced troubled times to varying degrees. If we accept the premise that our politicians in Westminster are no more or less corrupt than those of a number of South American governments the difference being our government don't kill its opponents or indulge in military coups and wholesale killing, but where monetary gain, social standing and the rigging of elections is the driving force for holding onto power, I see little difference.

The people of this country do not understand they live under a benign dictatorship, there are three rules that define a country under dictatorship, one being a country being ruled by a one party state, or a government being controlled by one person or by a small group of people.

The number of politicians sitting in Westminster compared to the rest of the population a relatively small group of people. It is an cruel illusion when the people go to the ballot box hoping that by removing a corrupt and incompetent government it will bring change if the political party they have selected from the comparatively small group of people have the exact same political aims and identical political ideologies. You will note when touting for your vote the promises of change by our two party political system are to all intents and purposes identical, in truth we have a one party state, any differences are cosmetic so as to confuse the people that there is any difference at all. It is a one party system, which is defined as a dictatorship.

If you find the word dictatorship distasteful perhaps you might accept our present government as being a Statist Government.

A statist government is a government which is driven by a political philosophy or ideology that holds that sovereignty is vested NOT in the people but in the national state, and that all individuals and associations exist only to enhance the power, the prestige, and the well-being of the state.

The fascist concept of statism, which as seen as synonymous with the concept of nation, and corporatism repudiates individualism and exalts the nation as an organic body headed by the Supreme Leader and nurtured by unity, force, and discipline. In Labour’s case the forced philosophy or ideology is Multiculturalism. In any case our two party political systems bear little resemblance to a democratic government.

Ask your local member if their political party will give the people a referendum on withdrawing or staying in Europe, ask them what plans they have to stop the rampant, non-stop, overwhelming, uncontrolled immigration into this country, ask them what their party’s views are on ID cards. There will be NO referendum on Europe simply because Europe’s fate has already been decided a long time ago. It cannot be dismantled, it is almost impossible even to use the opt-out clause. As an aside, Austria got bullied when the people chose a right leaning government that Brussels were not happy with. I repeat THERE WILL BE NO REFERENDUM ON EUROPE.

Cameron must have been perspiring for weeks when in a moment of madness he promised his party would offer the people a referendum, the condition being that by the General Election Poland had not accepted the EU constitution (Lisbon Treaty), lucky for him they did. Neither party have answers to our immigration problems, that ruling has already been decided in Brussels, but they won’t tell you that.

Perhaps in the future the BBC can do a TV series on our past corrupt politicians ‘Where are they now?’

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statism

Clown Cameron

Who bosses mice like Maurice around and has his own Hammer Throwing Party on the side

Guess who said;

"Taking into account the geographical situation of Gibraltar and the Muslim threat on its door, I would prefer to see a Spanish flag fly in Gibraltar before an Islamic one."

Well it was Mr Nick Griffin MEP, ChairMAN of the British National Party of course.

Guess who said;

"Britain and the rest of the European Union are ignoring a demographic time bomb: a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades, and almost no policy-makers are talking about it."

Well it was Daily Telegraph Foreign Editor Adrian Michaels of course.

Red Arrow shows their prime location

Let's Roll.  Nothing British was set up with the sole purpose of attacking the patriotic British National Party.  Their full site title is actually Nothing British about the BNP.

As you can see from their contact address:- 5, The Sanctuary, Opposite Westminster Abbey, London, SW1P 3JS, their offices are located in one of the most exclusive areas in London and are within easy walking distance of the Houses of Parliament - spitting distance in fact. 

This prime location, of course, makes it a very convenient place for MPs and other traitors to drop in for "friendly" chats.  Hopefully we will soon be able to provide you with images of just who does call into their offices.

The key players behind Nothing British, say that they are a cross party organisation created to attack the British National Party and deny that they are a conservative attack dog.  But as you can see from the following videos - and I urge you to watch them, you can see just what sort of slimy liars they really are.