What Really Is British Identity?

There's been quite a few incidents that have occurred recently that have aroused both confusion and concern in me and I'm sure many other proud British nationalists too. Two incidents in particular have sent contradictory messages about core values the British National Party stands for, that of the identity of the British people and their right to enjoy the liberty fought for and paid for in blood by their forebears, a precious birthright our enemies take great delight in stamping out.

On these two important issues the BNP has disappointed me enormously and I'll begin with the first count, an issue concerning a core value that is fundamental to Nationalists, our British identity.

I was delighted to learn that BNP deputy leader Simon Darby(above) was to feature in three BBC Radio interviews recently. I have been able to listen to two of them, one on BBC Radio Leicester and the second, the more high-profile Jeremy Vine lunchtime slot. On both of these interviews Simon Darby stated a position I believe to be in contradiction with British identity which I will attempt to outline clearly now.

During the BBC Leicester interview, Simon made the perfectly valid observation that the indigenous British people have a right to their identity. They have a right to organise and to preserve their identity, their culture and their way of life, just as all indigenous peoples do. Quite rightly he stated that those who oppose us and disgracefully smear British nationalists as "racists" would not deny the identity of indigenous aboriginal Australian people nor would they regard for example Indian-born Joanna Lumley as Indian.

This description of British identity is something I believe with every fibre of my being. I also support equally the rights of indigenous people in all countries to organise in this same way. Yet it's funny that in other nations - particularly the lands of origin of many immigrants to Britain - indigenous peoples staunchly defend this right and they certainly do not play the same Marxist-Liberal game of forcibly imposing Multiculturalism on their own people, a point I really wish Simon had added to his defence of the right of Britons to British identity.

I tire of hearing black Africans and Muslim rent-a-mouths smearing the British National Party as "racists" whereas back in their lands of origin their own people strongly uphold their respective identities and cultures excluding and even persecuting white people and others they regard as "untermensch" at every turn, witness South Africa and Zimbabwe and any Islamic country.

Simon was doing a very good job and then the somewhat lame BBC presenter - Tony Wadsworth - read out a message from a viewer stating that the BNP is a racist party (yawn) because it doesn't allow Polish people to become members.

"Well of course not you fool" I thought, "since when have Polish people been regarded as British - and why would they want to be regarded this way? Some people!"

Simon's reply gave me an unwanted surprise. He stated that the woman was "misinformed" and that the BNP has "Polish members and councillors".

Uh-oh. Straight away my spider-sense tingled in alarm and I thought "if this presenter joins up the dots he can criticise the BNP here as being a party that isn't about preserving British identity at all but rather a party that discriminates on colour." On this occasion, the presenter completely failed to realise the contradiction in Simon's response.

Next day I emailed the Green Arrow and stated my concern, namely allowing people of other races to join the party so long as they aren't coloured. I stated that if Simon Darby or any BNP representative faces a far more politically astute presenter this contradiction will be highlighted and it will go down like a lead balloon with the electorate.

I didn't have to wait long because Jeremy Vine highlighted this most succinctly right at the end of Simon's appearance on the popular lunchtime show. The hostile Vine asked an already-on-the-ropes Simon who had been too-easily ruffled by the rent-a-black gobshitte "comedian" playing the race card (what a surprise):

"So you feel you have more in common with a white Polish person than a black British person?" "Yes" replied Simon. "Thank you" came the curt Vine's closing of the interview hammering home the contradiction between identity and colour to his listeners.

Now I know the party makes it clear that it is open to indigenous Britons, i.e. Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Norse peoples and to other assimilable indigenous European peoples. But this raises what I believe to be a most serious question:

Do British Nationalists regard Poles and other Slavic people as sharing a common identity? Although Poles maybe white, may be smiling and friendly and share Christian faith, let's not forget that Poles who come into our country are competing with British workers for their jobs and keeping wages to a minimum as they do so. Indeed, many Poles came to Great Britain to find work, made as much as they possibly could and then cleared off back to Poland. All without any regard whatsoever for the negative long-term effects this would have on British workers and their communities.

I for one see no difference in immigrants from Africa and Pakistan to immigrants from Poland and other Slavic nations. I certainly do not believe that Slavic people share a common identity and I think in allowing Slavic people to become members of the BNP it sends a message that the BNP really isn't that concerned about preserving and protecting British identity, it is more concerned with keeping Britain white and I believe this will be an Achilles heel for the party and it will be exploited to the max by our enemies.

I bear Slavic peoples no grudge or malice by the way and in their countries, once again we see that they're not playing the Multicultural game and whilst Slavic people - namely Polish people - are quite happy flooding into Britain and diluting our culture and identity, their own cultures and identity are entirely preserved back in their homelands and this for me is the crux of the issue.

Now fair enough this is my opinion but I think my concerns are shared by others and well, I'm very interested to hear what my fellow Nationalists think, especially regarding the way this contradiction regarding identity can be interpreted by the British electorate. I would like to say that as someone who was formerly a dyed-in-the-wool Liberal, I know Liberals will regard this as validating their suspicions and we'll fail to win their vote regardless of the rights or wrongs of it. What do you think?

Communism Comes To The BNP

The second contradictory issue is perhaps something more alarming and something I feel the BNP should be criticised severely for. I am at heart a libertarian and one of the reasons I support the British National Party is because it is against the ongoing criminal removal of freedoms in British society and the wholly unacceptable overbearing interference of the state in our lives. The nanny-state is now at Orwellian "Big Brother" proportions with an ever-growing Marxist state Leviathan monitoring our every move and harvesting as much data about British citizens as they can with the ID card along with retina scans and DNA sampling mooted for the not-too-distant future.

Additionally, with the reigns of the state now being held by a collaborating lib/lab/con one party dictatorship, those who dare oppose these fascists - and the only real opposition these totalitarians face is from British Nationalists - are dehumanised and penalised by law as Marxists and their ilk cannot tolerate the proud patriots who place the interests of their once mighty nation first and give their support to the only hope the indigenous Britons have to preserve their identity and culture, the British National Party.

I absolutely despise with every ounce of my being these outrageous and disgraceful violations of human rights and such Marxist-Communist state infringements on personal liberty are control tactics that I never want to see the BNP adopt in any way.

After British soldiers had been abused by Muslim scum on the streets of Luton after returning from Iraq, angry Britons responded by forming a counter protest group - The British Defence Leagues. Now, let me say that although I am not sure about what is going on "behind the scenes" with this group, I have to say I am very pleased with what has been happening during their protests.

Watching the shrieking red leftards get a kicking from the moonbats they thought were their comrades; protesters raising the level of anti-Islamic opposition across the country and then seeing the reds embarrass themselves again by disrespecting the minute's silence for the fallen has all helped to bring home to previously slumbering Britons one or two truths about the left that the BNP has been stating for years. About time too!

I really don't know where it is all going and I'm not sure many British Nationalists do either, let's be completely honest. As ever there are the more paranoid Nationalists jumping to well-worn conspiracy theories involving the usual suspects but well, adopting a neutral "let's wait and see" approach could well pay future dividends. Time may well bring us a golden opportunity with these protests so keeping our powder dry may prove to be a canny tactic to deploy - for now.

But I was very disappointed with the BNP's approach. Fair enough, the party is now playing for higher stakes in the political arena due its fantastic growth so it has to be very astute about how it plays the nasty business of politics. It's understandable that the party proscribed the BDL but what really irked me was stating that any member who attends the protests will be disciplined and that if members know of any members who have attended the protests they should inform the party.

Silver foil meets amalgam filling! Encouraging snitching on your kinsmen? That's straight out of the Stasi handbook and it's something all Nationalists who value and cherish liberty should never want to see from the BNP no matter what. And what on earth happened to the "freedom of association" the BNP has so vehemently upheld when BNP supporters and members have been unjustly set-upon by the Marxist state and its collaborators in the media?

Let me ask you this: If you knew one of your brothers-in-arms had ratted on a comrade, would you want to stand alongside them in the trenches?

Why not state clearly and frankly that the party has serious concerns about the BDL and would strongly suggest that BNP members do not involve themselves in anyway pending the outcome of current ongoing investigations? Something like:

"Although we will not dictate to people as to who they choose to associate with, we respectfully and firmly request all members of the British National Party to please follow the party line and adopt a non-involvement, strictly neutral stance towards the British Defence League until further notice."

But encouraging members to rat on each other if they decide they'd like to join the protests? Bang out of order and there's simply no justification for it and it leaves a very nasty taste in the mouth. Let's sincerely hope this is the last time the BNP will deploy this abhorrent, strong-arm Stasi tactic that is a violation of personal liberty and in contradiction with the BNP's support for freedom.

I want to close this article on a positive note. Nick Griffin's long-anticipated and richly deserved appearance on the BBC's flagship political programme "Question Time" is scheduled for this coming Thursday, 22nd October and I for one am totally buzzing with excitement! It promises to be a defining moment for British Nationalism and although the old spider-sense is in turbo-charged tingle overdrive, I hope Nick gives these liars, thieves, parasites and traitors a merciless thrashing and shows the British people why the only hope for a better, stronger and prosperous Britain rests solely with the British National Party.

Give the bastards hell Nick - Britain expects.